By Bryan Smith, Bonneville County Republican Central Committee Fourth Vice Chair
Last week while Governor Little was out of state, Lieutenant Governor Janice McGeachin, acting as Governor in Little’s absence, signed an executive order that no political subdivision of Idaho could mandate masks. This action prevented cities, local school boards, and others from mandating masks. Upon his return, Little immediately rescinded McGeachin’s executive order. Now local governments can once again mandate masks.
Little called McGeachin’s actions a “self-serving political stunt” and “an abuse of power,” adding, “This kind of over-the-top executive action amounts to tyranny—something we all oppose.” Little said, “the significant consequences of the Lt. Governor’s flimsy executive order require me to clean up a mess.”
I think I’ve read about this kind of thing before. About 3,400 years ago, there was a guy named Moses who was the executive champion of his constituents who really wanted their civil rights restored. But there was another guy named “Pharoah,” who was the chief executive government official, and who was not the least bit interested hearing Moses’ pleas on behalf of his deplorable constituents. Pharoah thought he knew best for Moses’ “deplorables” although Moses’ people begged to differ. They thought they could best decide for themselves.
Moses talked to Pharoah a lot trying to convince him to let Moses’ constituents live their lives without government oppression. One day, Moses was so frustrated with Pharoah’s obstinance, Moses proclaimed to Pharoah, “let my people go,” but Pharoah was having none of it. Moses was patient, and when the opportunity presented itself, Moses restored his people’s civil rights. When Pharoah figured out that Moses had outmaneuvered him and freed the people, Pharoah threw a fit and did what he could to reverse their freedom. It’s kinds of a long story, but eventually, it didn’t work out well for Pharoah.
News reports at the time say Pharoah in a fit of rage called Moses’ actions a “self-serving political stunt” and “an abuse of power,” adding, “This kind of over-the-top executive action amounts to tyranny—something we all oppose.” Pharoah also muttered something about having to “clean up a mess” Moses created.
Just as I’ve never understood how Pharoah could be mad at Moses for wanting his people to be free, I just cannot understand how Little can claim freeing people from government mask mandates is “over the top tyranny.” Little’s argument makes sense only if McGeachin had issued an executive order forcing people to wear masks. But how does Little equate restraining government with tyranny?
Little said something else I just don’t get. Little said McGeachin’s executive order “runs contrary to a basic conservative principle—the government closest to the people governs best.” But no decision maker is closer to the people than the people themselves. And when it comes to personal health decisions like wearing a mask, I ask why government needs to be involved at all. The truth is that each person will make a better choice about his health than any bureaucrat, regardless of whether that bureaucrat makes the choice at a local, state, or national level.
The fact is that Little offers a false premise that local government can govern personal health choices better than individuals making decisions for themselves. If Little wanted to be true to conservative principles, he would have trusted the people to choose for themselves. He would have “let the people go.”